Revance Appoints Biotech and Pharmaceutical Executive, Olivia C. Ware, and Fintech and Payments Thought…

first_img Facebook Facebook Previous articleIn Israel and beyond, virus vaccines bring political powerNext articleJuniper Research: Smart Traffic Management to Significantly Reduce Congestion and Emissions; Saving Cities $277 Billion by 2025 Digital AIM Web Support By Digital AIM Web Support – February 22, 2021 Olivia C. Ware Pinterest WhatsApp Pinterestcenter_img Twitter Revance Appoints Biotech and Pharmaceutical Executive, Olivia C. Ware, and Fintech and Payments Thought Leader and Entrepreneur, Carey O’Connor Kolaja, to its Board of Directors TAGS  Local NewsBusiness WhatsApp Twitterlast_img read more

How Tax Reform Will Affect American Companies

first_img Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago Share Save Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago Sign up for DS News Daily The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago Related Articles The Week Ahead: Nearing the Forbearance Exit 2 days ago Previous: Manhattan, San Francisco Least Affordable U.S. Markets Next: The Week Ahead: Fed Chair Press Conference and FOMC Forecasts Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago in Daily Dose, Featured, Government, News Tagged with: Bank of America Brian Moynihan Tax Reform Video Spotlight Bank of America Brian Moynihan Tax Reform Video Spotlight 2017-12-08 David Whartoncenter_img Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago About Author: David Wharton How Tax Reform Will Affect American Companies Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago December 8, 2017 1,327 Views Home / Daily Dose / How Tax Reform Will Affect American Companies  Print This Post With the House and Senate coming together to work on the tax bill, Brian Moynihan, Bank of America Chairman and CEO, speaks about how tax reform will affect American companies. Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago David Wharton, Managing Editor at the Five Star Institute, is a graduate of the University of Texas at Arlington, where he received his B.A. in English and minored in Journalism. Wharton has over 16 years’ experience in journalism and previously worked at Thomson Reuters, a multinational mass media and information firm, as Associate Content Editor, focusing on producing media content related to tax and accounting principles and government rules and regulations for accounting professionals. Wharton has an extensive and diversified portfolio of freelance material, with published contributions in both online and print media publications. Wharton and his family currently reside in Arlington, Texas. He can be reached at [email protected] The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago Subscribelast_img read more

How Long Will Adhocism Continue In Teaching Facility? If Teachers Don’t Have Job Security, How Will They Discharge Their Duty?’: SC [Read Order]

first_imgTop StoriesHow Long Will Adhocism Continue In Teaching Facility? If Teachers Don’t Have Job Security, How Will They Discharge Their Duty?’: SC [Read Order] Mehal Jain24 Sep 2020 7:06 AMShare This – x”How long, how far will adhocism continue as regards the teaching faculty? If teachers don’t have job security, how will they discharge their duty of educating students, particularly in such (difficult) areas?”, asked Justice Ajay Rastogi on Thursday.The bench, presided over by Justice U. U. Lalit, was hearing a SLP against a August 14 judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, where the…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?Login”How long, how far will adhocism continue as regards the teaching faculty? If teachers don’t have job security, how will they discharge their duty of educating students, particularly in such (difficult) areas?”, asked Justice Ajay Rastogi on Thursday.The bench, presided over by Justice U. U. Lalit, was hearing a SLP against a August 14 judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, where the court had set aside the appointment of teachers inducted through the school management committee (SMC), further directing the state government to engage regular teachers against the substantive posts within six weeks.Senior Advocate C. A. Sundaram, appearing for the petitioner Period Basis SMC Teachers’ Association, explained that the members of the association are full-time teachers but contractual, teaching for any number of periods in a day, and that there is a lack of regular teachers in the hilly areas of HP.”Various schemes have been introduced by the state towards regularisation…the SMC scheme is covered under the Recruitment and Promotion Rules…the scheme itself is an open process…Other schemes are outside the Rules but they are still affirmed”, he advanced.”We are people who have been there for 10 years. We are qualified…The state also wanted to extend our tenure because it doesn’t have the 2000+ teachers needed…amidst such shortage of teachers, there are no classes for certain students”, urged Mr. Sundaram.”Lakhs and lakhs of people are qualified for various posts. Every qualified person cannot, as right, claim appointment”, observed Justice Rastogi.The bench sought to know the state’s stand from the concerned counsel Abhinav Mukherjee.Mr. Mukherjee apprised the court that even the state wished to challenge the impugned order of the High Court, and that a SLP would be filed shortly on behalf of the state. He referred to the Apex Court April, 2020 decision in Chandra Mohan Negi’s case, where the top court had rejected the challenge against the decision of the Himachal Pradesh Government to regularise teachers who were appointed under under Primary Assistant Teachers (PAT) scheme, Para Teachers Policy and other schemes. The bench comprising Justices Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and R. Subash Reddy had noted that it is clear all the persons who were recruited under the schemes were fully qualified as per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules.Justice Lalit noted that while the emoluments payable to the petitioners are Rs. 10,000-15,000 per month, the salaries payable to the regular teachers were higher, Rs. 21,000 being the lower scale.”This is probably why the state is also coming in challenge. It wants to keep the same budget”, remarked the bench.The bench was not inclined to stay the impugned judgment until the state has filed its SLP and has been heard- “The moment the state is supporting your cause, until the contents are worked out and there have been hearings, we cannot grant a stay”Adjourning the matter to October 8, the bench sought details on the number of teachers working under the scheme in question, whether working in towns or districts and the emolument situation.The HP High Court had remarked that “The pedestal of Articles 14 and 16, of, the Constitution of India, does, ensure(s) to every aspirant, qua his becoming purveyed, or hence his/their becoming enabled, to, propagate the sacrosanct right, of, equality, of, opportunity, to at least, enter the arena of competition, or to occur, in the zone of consideration”. It had ruled that there is a “palpable open breach of the mandate of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India” by the state authorities in inducting the teachers through the SMC.Click Here To Download Order[Read Order] Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more